As per our current architecture, providing UDF in sub ledger and ledger is not feasible for us. We would request you to kindly provide us a list of fields required to be implemented. If the fields are generic, we would add them as generic fields only.
As of now, we are marking this idea as "Unlikely to implement". Thank you for your understanding.
Can you expand upon this request and what you are looking for? We would like to know more about the type of information you are willing to save in ledger and sub-ledger masters. If the requirement is generic, we may add the specific information fields, else UDF will be provided. We are going to classify as Unlikely to implement for now, until we gather more information related to the request so that we can gain a better understanding.
Sushil Agarwal
Dear Sir,
As per our current architecture, providing UDF in sub ledger and ledger is not feasible for us. We would request you to kindly provide us a list of fields required to be implemented. If the fields are generic, we would add them as generic fields only.
As of now, we are marking this idea as "Unlikely to implement". Thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
Product Team
GINESYS
Attachments Open full size
Can you expand upon this request and what you are looking for? We would like to know more about the type of information you are willing to save in ledger and sub-ledger masters. If the requirement is generic, we may add the specific information fields, else UDF will be provided. We are going to classify as Unlikely to implement for now, until we gather more information related to the request so that we can gain a better understanding.
Attachments Open full size